Is this where America is headed??

You And Your Gun Rights & Other Important Stuff
Post Reply
User avatar
smokem
Posts: 2291
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 8:50 pm
Location: Jamestown, NC
Contact:

Is this where America is headed??

Post by smokem »

You're sound asleep when you hear a thump

outside your bedroom door. Half-awake, and nearly paralyzed with fear, you

hear muffled whispers. At least two people have broken into your house and

are moving your way. With your heart pumping, you reach down beside your bed

and pick up your shotgun. You rack a shell into the chamber, then inch

toward the door and open it. In the darkness, you make out two shadows.


One holds something that looks like a

crowbar. When the intruder brandishes it as if to strike, you raise the

shotgun and fire. The blast knocks both thugs to the floor. One writhes and

screams while the second man crawls to the front door and lurches outside.

As you pick up the telephone to call police, you know you're in trouble.


In your country, most guns were outlawed

years before, and the few that are privately owned are so stringently

regulated as to make them useless. Yours was never registered. Police arrive

and inform you that the second burglar has died. They arrest you for First

Degree Murder and Illegal Possession of a Firearm. When you talk to your

attorney, he tells you not to worry: authorities will probably plea the case

down to manslaughter.


"What kind of sentence will I get?" you ask.


"Only ten-to-twelve years," he replies, as

if that's nothing. "Behave yourself, and you'll be out in seven."


The next day, the shooting is the lead story

in the local newspaper. Somehow, you're portrayed as an eccentric vigilante

while the two men you shot are represented as choirboys. Their friends and

relatives can't find an unkind word to say about them. Buried deep down in

the article, authorities acknowledge that b oth "victims" have been arrested

numerous times. But the next day's headline says it all: "Lovable Rogue Son

Didn't Deserve to Die." The thieves have been transformed from career

criminals into Robin Hood-type pranksters. As the days wear on, the story

takes wings. The national media picks it up, then the international media.

The surviving burglar has become a folk hero.


Your attorney says the thief is preparing to

sue you, and he'll probably win. The media publishes reports that your home

has been burglarized several times in the past and that you've been critical

of local police for their lack of effort in apprehending the suspects. After

the last break-in, you told your neighbor that you would be prepared next

time. The District Attorney uses this to allege that you were lying in wait

for the burglars.


A few months later, you go to trial. The

charges haven't been reduced, as your lawyer had so confidently predicted.

When you take the stand, your anger at the injustice of it all works against

you. Prosecutors paint a picture of you as a mean, vengeful man. It doesn't

take long for the jury to convict you of all charges.


The judge sentences you to life in prison.


This case really happened.


On August 22, 1999, Tony Martin of Emneth,

Norfolk , England , killed one burglar and wounded a second. In April, 2000,

he was convicted and is now serving a life term.


How did it become a crime to defend one's

own life in the once great British Empire ?


It started with the Pistols Act of 1903.

This seemingly reasonable law forbade selling pistols to minors or felons

and established that handgun sales were to be made only to those who had a

license. The Firearms Act of 1920 expanded licensing to include not only

handguns but all firearms except shotguns.


Later laws passed in 1953 and 1967 outlawed

the carrying of any weapon by private citizens and mandated the registration

of all shotguns.


Momentum for total handgun confiscation

began in earnest after the Hungerfo rd mass shooting in 1987. Michael Ryan,

a mentally disturbed Man with a Kalashnikov rifle, walked down the streets

shooting everyone he saw. When the smoke cleared, 17 people were dead.


The British public, already de-sensitized by

eighty years of "gun control", demanded even tougher restrictions. (The

seizure of all privately owned handguns was the objective even though Ryan

used a rifle.)


Nine years later, at Dunblane , Scotland ,

Thomas Hamilton used a semi-automatic weapon to murder 16 children and a

teacher at a public school..


For many years, the media had portrayed all

gun owners as mentally unstable, or worse, criminals. Now the press had a

real kook with which to beat up law-abiding gun owners. Day after day, week

after week, the media gave up all pretense of objectivity and demanded a

total ban on all handguns. The Dunblane Inquiry, a few months later, sealed

the fate of the few sidearm still owned by private citizens.


During the years in which the British

government incrementally took away most gun rights, the notion that a

citizen had the right to armed self-defense came to be seen as vigilantism.

Authorities refused to grant gun licenses to people who were threatened,

claiming that self-defense was no longer considered a reason to own a gun.

Citizens who shot burglars or robbers or rapists were charged while the real

criminals were released.


Indeed, after the Martin shooting, a police

spokesman was quoted as saying, "We cannot have people take the law into

their own hands."


All of Martin's neighbors had been robbed

numerous times, and several elderly people were severely injured in beatings

by young thugs who had no fear of the consequences. Martin himself, a

collector of antiques, had seen most of his collection trashed or stolen by

burglars.


When the Dunblane Inquiry ended, citizens

who owned handguns were given three months to turn them over to local

authorities. Being good British subjects, most people obeyed the law. The

few who didn't were visited by police and threatened with ten-year prison

sentences if they didn't comply.. Police later bragged that they'd taken

nearly 200,000 handguns from private citizens.


How did the authorities know who had

handguns? The guns had been registered and licensed. Kinda like cars.


Sound familiar?


WAKE UP AMERICA , THIS IS WHY OUR FOUNDING

FATHERS PUT THE SECOND AMENDMENT IN OUR CONSTITUTION.


"..it does not require a majority to

prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in

people's minds.."


--Samuel Adams


If you think this is important, please

forward.
Post Reply